State v. Huffman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Huffman

192 S.E.2d 621, 16 N.C. App. 653, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1800

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Huffman. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 N.C. App. 92 →

Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided November 22, 1972·No. No. 7226SC632·Published

Opinion

BRITT, Judge.

Although defendant’s brief does not comply with the rules of this court, we have carefully reviewed the record on appeal, with particular reference to the questions raised in the brief, but find no prejudicial error. We hold that defendant received a fair trial and the sentences imposed are within the limits provided by applicable statutes. G.S. 14-54; G.S. 14-72; G.S. 14-2.

No error.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Brock concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRITT, Judge.

Although defendant’s brief does not comply with the rules of this court, we have carefully reviewed the record on appeal, with particular reference to the questions raised in the brief, but find no prejudicial error. We hold that defendant received a fair trial and the sentences imposed are within the limits provided by applicable statutes. G.S. 14-54; G.S. 14-72; G.S. 14-2.

No error.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Brock concur.

State v. Huffman, 192 S.E.2d 621, 16 N.C. App. 653, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1800 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

192 S.E.2d 621 (State v. Huffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.