State v. Huey

266 So. 2d 214, 262 La. 1073, 1972 La. LEXIS 4937
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedSeptember 18, 1972
DocketNo. 52631
StatusPublished

This text of 266 So. 2d 214 (State v. Huey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Huey, 266 So. 2d 214, 262 La. 1073, 1972 La. LEXIS 4937 (La. 1972).

Opinion

BARHAM, J.,

is of opinion the writ should be granted. See Haynes v. United States, 390 U.S. 85, 88 S.Ct. 722, 19 L.Ed. 2d 923, and United States v. Freed, 401 U.S. 601, 91 S.Ct. 1112, 28 L.Ed.2d 356 for a clear U. S. Supreme Court adjudication of the precise issue contrary to the trial court.

DIXON, J., is of the opinion that the writ should be granted. We should not avoid consideration of the constitutionality of the statute under which defendant is charged. In the event of conviction, defendant has no right of appeal unless the sentence is long enough to give this court jurisdiction. There is no right of appeal in Louisiana unless the sentence exceeds minimums fixed in our Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haynes v. United States
390 U.S. 85 (Supreme Court, 1968)
United States v. Freed
401 U.S. 601 (Supreme Court, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 So. 2d 214, 262 La. 1073, 1972 La. LEXIS 4937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-huey-la-1972.