State v. Huey

Indiana Supreme Court

State v. Huey

16 Ind. 338, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 171

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 8, 1861

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 Ind. 338 (State v. Huey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Huey, 16 Ind. 338, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 171 (Ind. 1861).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was a prosecution against the appellees for “public indecency.”

On the trial the defendants were acquitted, but the State brings up the case upon points of law reserved during the progress of the trial. We have decided that there is no such offense as public indecency. Jennings v. The State, ante, p. 335. It follows that the record presents no legitimate question for our decision.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This was a prosecution against the appellees for “public indecency.”

On the trial the defendants were acquitted, but the State brings up the case upon points of law reserved during the progress of the trial. We have decided that there is no such offense as public indecency. Jennings v. The State, ante, p. 335. It follows that the record presents no legitimate question for our decision.

The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Ind. 338, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-huey-ind-1861.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack