State v. Hudson
31 A.3d 271, 208 N.J. 385, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 1261
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 31, 2011·No. M-1092, September Term 2010 066660·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
ORDER
This matter having been brought to the Court on the State’s motion for clarification,
it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for clarification
is granted, in part, and the Order granting the petition for certification is modified to limit the appeal to the issue of whether it was an abuse of discretion to sentence defendant to an extended term consecutive to the extended term defendant was then serving.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hudson, 31 A.3d 271, 208 N.J. 385, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 1261 (N.J. 2011).
31 A.3d 271 (State v. Hudson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hudson
39 A.3d 150 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012)