State v. Hudson
488 S.W.3d 144, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 122, 2016 WL 616340
Opinion
ORDER
Ryan Hudson appeals the trial court’s judgment after a jury convicted him of robbery, kidnapping, burglary, and armed criminal action. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of. the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hudson, 488 S.W.3d 144, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 122, 2016 WL 616340 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).
488 S.W.3d 144 (State v. Hudson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hudson v. State
563 S.W.3d 834 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2018)