State v. Hudson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hudson

488 S.W.3d 144, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 122, 2016 WL 616340

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 16, 2016

DocketNo. ED 101986

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 488 S.W.3d 144 (State v. Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hudson, 488 S.W.3d 144, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 122, 2016 WL 616340 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Ryan Hudson appeals the trial court’s judgment after a jury convicted him of robbery, kidnapping, burglary, and armed criminal action. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of. the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI