State v. Hudson

870 S.W.2d 253, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 233, 1994 WL 41361

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of attempted first degree robbery, §§ 564.011, 569.020, RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the court as a persistent offender to consecutive prison terms of twenty years on the attempted first degree robbery count and seven years on the armed criminal action count. He also appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).