State v. Hudson
This text of 920 So. 2d 1223 (State v. Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The State appeals an order granting a motion to mitigate pursuant to rule 3.800(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We reverse because Sabrina Hudson was sentenced on October 28, 2004, and the motion was not filed until February 23, 2005, which was more than 60 days after the sentencing date. A court may reduce or modify a legal sentence imposed by it within 60 days after its imposition. “A trial court lacks the jurisdiction to mitigate or modify a legal sentence previously imposed after the above sixty day time periods have elapsed.” State v. Migdahl, 353 So.2d 635, 637 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
Reversed and remanded with directions to reinstate the original sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
920 So. 2d 1223, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2323, 2006 WL 399447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hudson-fladistctapp-2006.