State v. Hubbard

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hubbard

463 S.W.3d 357, 2015 WL 4497719

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 20, 2015·No. No. ED 101186·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Richard T. Hubbard appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Ralls [358] County finding him guilty of second-degree child molestation.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the matter complained of unpreserved. We decline to review for plain error. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.' The parties, however, have been furnished with a written statement, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Richard T. Hubbard appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Ralls [358] County finding him guilty of second-degree child molestation.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the matter complained of unpreserved. We decline to review for plain error. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.' The parties, however, have been furnished with a written statement, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Hubbard, 463 S.W.3d 357, 2015 WL 4497719 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

463 S.W.3d 357 (State v. Hubbard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.