State v. Hubbard

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hubbard

245 S.W.3d 918, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 243, 2008 WL 425576

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 19, 2008

DocketED 90620

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 S.W.3d 918 (State v. Hubbard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hubbard, 245 S.W.3d 918, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 243, 2008 WL 425576 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PATRICIAL. COHEN, Chief Judge.

Brian K. Hubbard (Defendant) was convicted of sexual misconduct in the first degree. The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed Defendant on probation for two years with conditions. Defendant has now filed his notice of appeal from this judgment of conviction. We dismiss the appeal.

The criminal appeals statutes limit the right of appeal to final judgments. Section 547.070, RSMo 2000. In a criminal case, the judgment becomes final for purposes of appeal when the judgment and sentence are entered. State v. Welch, 865 S.W.2d 434, 435 (Mo.App. E.D.1993). Therefore, when imposition of the sentence is suspended, the judgment is not final and a defendant may not appeal it. State v. Lynch, 679 S.W.2d 858, 860 (Mo. banc 1984); See also, State v. Larson, 79 S.W.3d 891, 892 (Mo. banc 2002). Here, the court suspended imposition of Defendant’s sentence. As a result, there is no final, appealable judgment.

Where there is no final, appealable judgment, we have no jurisdiction to con *919 sider the appeal. State v. Palm, 158 S.W.3d 861 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). We issued an order to Defendant directing him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed. Defendant has not filed a response.

Defendant’s appeal is dismissed without prejudice for lack of a final, appealable judgment.

BOOKER T. SHAW and NANNETTE A. BAKER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PATRICIAL. COHEN, Chief Judge.

Brian K. Hubbard (Defendant) was convicted of sexual misconduct in the first degree. The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed Defendant on probation for two years with conditions. Defendant has now filed his notice of appeal from this judgment of conviction. We dismiss the appeal.

The criminal appeals statutes limit the right of appeal to final judgments. Section 547.070, RSMo 2000. In a criminal case, the judgment becomes final for purposes of appeal when the judgment and sentence are entered. State v. Welch, 865 S.W.2d 434, 435 (Mo.App. E.D.1993). Therefore, when imposition of the sentence is suspended, the judgment is not final and a defendant may not appeal it. State v. Lynch, 679 S.W.2d 858, 860 (Mo. banc 1984); See also, State v. Larson, 79 S.W.3d 891, 892 (Mo. banc 2002). Here, the court suspended imposition of Defendant’s sentence. As a result, there is no final, appealable judgment.

Where there is no final, appealable judgment, we have no jurisdiction to con *919 sider the appeal. State v. Palm, 158 S.W.3d 861 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). We issued an order to Defendant directing him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed. Defendant has not filed a response.

Defendant’s appeal is dismissed without prejudice for lack of a final, appealable judgment.

BOOKER T. SHAW and NANNETTE A. BAKER, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 S.W.3d 918, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 243, 2008 WL 425576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hubbard-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack