State v. Howe
This text of 2017 ND 90 (State v. Howe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 4/25/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2017 ND 90
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Richard Scott Howe, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20160331
Appeal from the District Court of Adams County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Rhonda Rae Ehlis, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Aaron W. Roseland, P.O. Box 390, Hettinger, ND 58639, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Laura C. Ringsak, 103 S. Third St., Ste. 6, Bismarck, ND 58501, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
State v. Howe
[¶1] Richard Howe appeals a district court’s judgment after a jury convicted him on two counts of possession of a controlled substance and two counts of possession of drug paraphernalia. Howe argues the guilty verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. We conclude sufficient evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 ND 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-howe-nd-2017.