State v. Howard
This text of 31 Vt. 414 (State v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We do not regard this court as having any control over this subject. Its jurisdiction, at present, is by statute limited to certain specified matters, the chief of which are hearing matters in error from the county court, chancery appeals, and that general supervision of inferior tribunals, and public officers, which are at common law exercised by the court of King’s Bench in England. .
The several county courts have exclusive jurisdiction of the trial of all persons charged with crime and criminal offences, above the jurisdiction of justices of the peace. If there is any power, any where, to grant this petition, it must reside in the county court for the county of Orange. But as the statute provides, in general terms, for the trial of criminal cases in the county where the offence is charged to have been committed, we do not perceive how any court could order a trial in such cases in any other county.
There will sometimes arise cases where a change of venue might be desirable, and this may be one of that class. But it will require the interference of the legislature before that can be done, and it is for them to determine when such provision becomes desirable.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 Vt. 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-howard-vt-1858.