State v. Howard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Howard

649 S.E.2d 637, 2007 N.C. LEXIS 756, 2007 WL 2422864

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 3, 2007·No. No. 571P06.·Published

Opinion

Defendant's petition for writ of certiorari is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding the case to the trial court for reconsideration in light of the decisions of this Court and the Court of Appeals in State v. Ellis, 361 N.C. 200, 639 S.E.2d 425 (2007), State v. Wall, 348 N.C. 671, 502 S.E.2d 585 (1998), and Hamilton v. Freeman, 147 N.C.App. 195, 554 S.E.2d 856 (2001).

By order of the Court in Conference, this 3rd day of May, 2007.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant's petition for writ of certiorari is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding the case to the trial court for reconsideration in light of the decisions of this Court and the Court of Appeals in State v. Ellis, 361 N.C. 200, 639 S.E.2d 425 (2007), State v. Wall, 348 N.C. 671, 502 S.E.2d 585 (1998), and Hamilton v. Freeman, 147 N.C.App. 195, 554 S.E.2d 856 (2001).

By order of the Court in Conference, this 3rd day of May, 2007.

State v. Howard, 649 S.E.2d 637, 2007 N.C. LEXIS 756, 2007 WL 2422864 (N.C. 2007).

Pincite

649 S.E.2d 637 (State v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related