State v. Howard

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Howard

174 S.W.3d 53, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1538, 2005 WL 2739266

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Howard. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1564 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 25, 2005·No. ED 85164·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Howard (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of one count of first-degree assault and one count of armed criminal action. Defendant claims the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of second-degree assault.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Howard (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of one count of first-degree assault and one count of armed criminal action. Defendant claims the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of second-degree assault.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Howard, 174 S.W.3d 53, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1538, 2005 WL 2739266 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

174 S.W.3d 53 (State v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related