State v. Howard

130 A. 917, 124 Me. 448, 1925 Me. LEXIS 59
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedSeptember 2, 1925
StatusPublished

This text of 130 A. 917 (State v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Howard, 130 A. 917, 124 Me. 448, 1925 Me. LEXIS 59 (Me. 1925).

Opinion

An indictment for forgery and for uttering a forged instrument. Respondent demurred at the April Term, 1925. His demurrer was overruled and the indictment adjudged good. Respondent excepted. His exceptions were adjudged frivolous and were certified and transmitted to the Chief Justice under See. 55, Chap. 82, R. S. No arguments were presented by either side within the time fixed by the statute. An examination of the indictment shows the demurrer to be without [449]*449merit. The counts are in the form commonly in use and set forth all the essential elements of the offense charged. Entry must be: Exceptions overruled. Judgment for the State.

Leonard R. Campbell, for the State. Edward C. Payson, for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 A. 917, 124 Me. 448, 1925 Me. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-howard-me-1925.