State v. Howard
This text of 130 A. 917 (State v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An indictment for forgery and for uttering a forged instrument. Respondent demurred at the April Term, 1925. His demurrer was overruled and the indictment adjudged good. Respondent excepted. His exceptions were adjudged frivolous and were certified and transmitted to the Chief Justice under See. 55, Chap. 82, R. S. No arguments were presented by either side within the time fixed by the statute. An examination of the indictment shows the demurrer to be without [449]*449merit. The counts are in the form commonly in use and set forth all the essential elements of the offense charged. Entry must be: Exceptions overruled. Judgment for the State.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
130 A. 917, 124 Me. 448, 1925 Me. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-howard-me-1925.