State v. Howard

159 A. 841, 35 Del. 143, 5 W.W. Harr. 143, 1931 Del. LEXIS 16
CourtDelaware Court of Oyer and Terminer
DecidedNovember 17, 1931
DocketNo. 74
StatusPublished

This text of 159 A. 841 (State v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Delaware Court of Oyer and Terminer primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Howard, 159 A. 841, 35 Del. 143, 5 W.W. Harr. 143, 1931 Del. LEXIS 16 (Del. Super. Ct. 1931).

Opinion

Pennewill, C. J.:

The contention of the defendant’s

attorney may be in conformity with the trend of recent authority; but we cannot disregard a decision in our own state which seems to be directly in point. State v. Turner, Housh Cr. Cas. 76.

The objection of the State is, therefore, sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 A. 841, 35 Del. 143, 5 W.W. Harr. 143, 1931 Del. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-howard-deloyerterm-1931.