State v. Hoveskeland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Hoveskeland

782 P.2d 957, 99 Or. App. 486, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 1926

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedNovember 22, 1989

DocketP060126, P060127; CA A60739, A60740

StatusPublished

This text of 782 P.2d 957 (State v. Hoveskeland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hoveskeland, 782 P.2d 957, 99 Or. App. 486, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 1926 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals her convictions for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010, and driving without a valid license. ORS 807.010. She contends that the court erred by denying her motion to suppress evidence that was made on the ground that the officer did not have a reasonable suspicion to support his stop of the vehicle that she was driving. The state concedes that the court erred. We agree.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals her convictions for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010, and driving without a valid license. ORS 807.010. She contends that the court erred by denying her motion to suppress evidence that was made on the ground that the officer did not have a reasonable suspicion to support his stop of the vehicle that she was driving. The state concedes that the court erred. We agree.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

782 P.2d 957, 99 Or. App. 486, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 1926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hoveskeland-orctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack