State v. Houston

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Houston

164 So. 3d 824, 2015 La. LEXIS 646, 2015 WL 1757956

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 10, 2015

DocketNo. 2014-KP-1055

StatusPublished

This text of 164 So. 3d 824 (State v. Houston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Houston, 164 So. 3d 824, 2015 La. LEXIS 646, 2015 WL 1757956 (La. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

I,Granted. The order of the court of appeal is vacated and the trial court’s ruling denying respondent’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea is reinstated. A trial court may not ignore “objective medical evidence” as a reasonable basis for revisiting a prior finding that the defendant is competent to proceed to trial. State v. Snyder, 98-1078, p. 26 (La.4/14/99), 750 So.2d 832, 852, reversed and remanded on other grounds, Snyder v. Louisiana, 545 U.S. 1137, 125 S.Ct. 2956, 162 L.Ed.2d 884 (2005). In the present case, however, the trial court specifically found, and nothing presented to this Court disputes, that at the time respondent entered his guilty plea, he failed to provide the court with any evidence, despite having been given the opportunity to do so, giving rise to reasonable grounds for doubting the court’s earlier finding of competency following an extended hearing on the report of the sanity commission. The trial court therefore did not abuse its discretion in denying respondent’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

I,Granted. The order of the court of appeal is vacated and the trial court’s ruling denying respondent’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea is reinstated. A trial court may not ignore “objective medical evidence” as a reasonable basis for revisiting a prior finding that the defendant is competent to proceed to trial. State v. Snyder, 98-1078, p. 26 (La.4/14/99), 750 So.2d 832, 852, reversed and remanded on other grounds, Snyder v. Louisiana, 545 U.S. 1137, 125 S.Ct. 2956, 162 L.Ed.2d 884 (2005). In the present case, however, the trial court specifically found, and nothing presented to this Court disputes, that at the time respondent entered his guilty plea, he failed to provide the court with any evidence, despite having been given the opportunity to do so, giving rise to reasonable grounds for doubting the court’s earlier finding of competency following an extended hearing on the report of the sanity commission. The trial court therefore did not abuse its discretion in denying respondent’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 So. 3d 824, 2015 La. LEXIS 646, 2015 WL 1757956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-houston-la-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack