State v. Houser
44 N.C. 410
Opinion
The only point made is upon the difference be[411] tween Michal and Michaels. This is settled. State v. Patterson, 2 Ire. 346. There, Deadema and Diadema was held to be no variance.
Per Curiam, Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Houser, 44 N.C. 410 (N.C. 1853).
44 N.C. 410 (State v. Houser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. . Utley
25 S.E.2d 195 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1943)
Macomber v. Kinney
128 N.W. 1001 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1910)
State v. . Hester
29 S.E. 380 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1898)
State v. . Collins
20 S.E. 452 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1894)