State v. Houseman

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Houseman

530 S.W.3d 516

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 23, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104575

StatusPublished

This text of 530 S.W.3d 516 (State v. Houseman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Houseman, 530 S.W.3d 516 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gabriel Houseman appeals from the judgment entered after a bench trial on his conviction for one count of unlawful possession of a firearm. The evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gabriel Houseman appeals from the judgment entered after a bench trial on his conviction for one count of unlawful possession of a firearm. The evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

530 S.W.3d 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-houseman-moctapp-2017.