State v. Houseman

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Houseman

530 S.W.3d 516

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 23, 2017·No. No. ED 104575·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gabriel Houseman appeals from the judgment entered after a bench trial on his conviction for one count of unlawful possession of a firearm. The evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gabriel Houseman appeals from the judgment entered after a bench trial on his conviction for one count of unlawful possession of a firearm. The evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Houseman, 530 S.W.3d 516 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

530 S.W.3d 516 (State v. Houseman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.