State v. House

1921 OK CR 115, 198 P. 888, 19 Okla. Crim. 204, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 58
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJune 16, 1921
DocketNo. A-2613.
StatusPublished

This text of 1921 OK CR 115 (State v. House) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. House, 1921 OK CR 115, 198 P. 888, 19 Okla. Crim. 204, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 58 (Okla. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

BESSEY, J.

L. C. House was by information, filed October 18, 1915, charged with Sabbath breaking by conducting a moving picture show on Sunday. To this information he interposed a demurrer, which was by the court sustained, and the state appeals. The charging part of the information is as follows:

"That he, the said L. C. House, did willfully and unlawfully keep open, run, operate, engage in and carry on his moving picture show in Coalgate, Okla., on the first day of the week, and the Lord’s Day, which is commonly called Sunday, for the purpose of carrying on and doing business by running said moving picture show on said date, said business being the usual trade carried on by said defendant, and that the said defendant did charge and receive and collect an admittance fee of ten cents of and from all persons who entered said moving picture show and witnessed the said show. That the keeping, running, operating, managing and carrying on said moving picture show was for money and for profit and' gain, and was defendant’s means of making a livelihood, and was a continuation of defendant’s usual trade and business during the¡ week; the same not being a work or trade of charity or necessity, contrary to the form of the statutes in such eases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the state.’’

The defendant interposed a demurrer to the information on the ground that the allegations contained in said information were insufficient to show any offense against the laws of the state of Oklahoma. The court sustained the demurrer, and the state refused to plead further. Whereupon the court rendered judgment, dismissing the cause, and the state prosecutes the appeal from the order and judgment sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the cause.

*206 The issues here involved are similar to those decided in the case of State v. Clint Smith, A-2497, 19 Okla. Cr. 184, 198 Pac. 879, recently decided, and for the reasons there given the order and judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

DOYLE, P. J., concurs.

MATSON, J., disqualified and not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Smith
1921 OK CR 108 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1921 OK CR 115, 198 P. 888, 19 Okla. Crim. 204, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-house-oklacrimapp-1921.