State v. Houghtaling

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Houghtaling

182 So. 2d 446, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5905

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 1966

DocketNo. 64-593

StatusPublished

This text of 182 So. 2d 446 (State v. Houghtaling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Houghtaling, 182 So. 2d 446, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5905 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on April 13, 1965 (173 So.2d 748) affirming in part and reversing in part the order of the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Florida in the above styled cause, and,

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed December 1, 1965 (181 So.2d 636) and mandate dated February 1, 1966, now lodged in this court, reversed in part and affirmed in part this court’s judgment and remanded the cause for further proceedings consistent with the said opinion and judgment of the-Supreme Court of Florida;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court issued in this cause-on April 30, 1965 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed April 13, 1965, insofar as it is in conflict with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida, is withdrawn and vacated, and the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court. The opinion and judgment of this court, except as withdrawn and vacated, as aforesaid, is adhered to and the order of the criminal court of record appealed from in this cause is reversed; costs allowed shall be taxed in the Criminal Court of Record (Rule 3.16 b, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on April 13, 1965 (173 So.2d 748) affirming in part and reversing in part the order of the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Florida in the above styled cause, and,

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed December 1, 1965 (181 So.2d 636) and mandate dated February 1, 1966, now lodged in this court, reversed in part and affirmed in part this court’s judgment and remanded the cause for further proceedings consistent with the said opinion and judgment of the-Supreme Court of Florida;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court issued in this cause-on April 30, 1965 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed April 13, 1965, insofar as it is in conflict with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida, is withdrawn and vacated, and the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court. The opinion and judgment of this court, except as withdrawn and vacated, as aforesaid, is adhered to and the order of the criminal court of record appealed from in this cause is reversed; costs allowed shall be taxed in the Criminal Court of Record (Rule 3.16 b, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 So. 2d 446, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-houghtaling-fladistctapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack