State v. Hotchkiss
30 Tex. 162
Opinion
The motion to quash the bond in this cause, because the defendant was not charged with any offense against the law, was improperly sustained. It was held in the case of Hodges v. The State, 20 Tex., 493, that “an assault with intent to kill is an offense for which the accused might be convicted of the assault, if not also of the intent to murder.” The recognizance in that case was held legally sufficient, as also in Wilson v. The State, Galveston T., 1860, [25 Tex., 169.]
The judgment is reversed, and the cause
Eemahded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hotchkiss, 30 Tex. 162 (Tex. 1867).
30 Tex. 162 (State v. Hotchkiss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hodges v. State
165 S.W. 607 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Meredith v. State
40 Tex. 480 (Texas Supreme Court, 1874)