State v. Hotaling

46 N.J.L. 207
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 15, 1884
StatusPublished

This text of 46 N.J.L. 207 (State v. Hotaling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hotaling, 46 N.J.L. 207 (N.J. 1884).

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The judgment in this case should be affirmed for the reasons given by the court below.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Knapp, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Clement, Cole, Paterson, Whitaker. 10. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 N.J.L. 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hotaling-nj-1884.