State v. Hoskins

Wyoming Supreme Court

State v. Hoskins

212 P. 766, 29 Wyo. 198, 1923 Wyo. LEXIS 6

Wyoming Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1923·No. No. 1059·Published

Opinion

BluME,' Justice.

By stipulation entered herein it was agreed by counsel that the decision of this court in Case No. 1058 should be taken for, and should be, the decision and opinion of the court in this case. Case No. 1058 having been this day decided against relator, it is accordingly ordered that the mandamus herein prayed for should be and the same is hereby denied for the reasons set forth in the opinion filed in said case No. 1058.

Denied.

Potter, Ch. J., and Kimball, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BluME,' Justice.

By stipulation entered herein it was agreed by counsel that the decision of this court in Case No. 1058 should be taken for, and should be, the decision and opinion of the court in this case. Case No. 1058 having been this day decided against relator, it is accordingly ordered that the mandamus herein prayed for should be and the same is hereby denied for the reasons set forth in the opinion filed in said case No. 1058.

Denied.

Potter, Ch. J., and Kimball, J., concur.

State v. Hoskins, 212 P. 766, 29 Wyo. 198, 1923 Wyo. LEXIS 6 (Wyo. 1923).

Pincite

212 P. 766 (State v. Hoskins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.