State v. Hoskins

501 P.3d 101, 316 Or. App. 702
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 29, 2021
DocketA173237
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 501 P.3d 101 (State v. Hoskins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hoskins, 501 P.3d 101, 316 Or. App. 702 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Submitted December 2, affirmed December 29, 2021

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAYSON ANTHONY HOSKINS, Defendant-Appellant. Tillamook County Circuit Court 18CR65905; A173237 501 P3d 101

Jonathan R. Hill, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Nora Coon, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Weston Koyama, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and DeHoog, Judge, and Mooney, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Merrill, 311 Or App 487, 492 P3d 722, adh’d to as modified on recons, 314 Or App 460, 495 P3d 219 (2021).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Peden
501 P.3d 101 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
501 P.3d 101, 316 Or. App. 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hoskins-orctapp-2021.