State v. HOSICK

341 S.W.3d 806, 2011 WL 2020713
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 24, 2011
DocketED 95095
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 341 S.W.3d 806 (State v. HOSICK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. HOSICK, 341 S.W.3d 806, 2011 WL 2020713 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Damon Hosick appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of two counts of statutory rape, four counts of statutory sodomy, and two counts of incest.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose *807 would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. State
341 S.W.3d 806 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
341 S.W.3d 806, 2011 WL 2020713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hosick-moctapp-2011.