State v. HOSICK

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. HOSICK

341 S.W.3d 806, 2011 WL 2020713

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 24, 2011·No. ED 95095·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Damon Hosick appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of two counts of statutory rape, four counts of statutory sodomy, and two counts of incest.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose *807 would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Damon Hosick appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of two counts of statutory rape, four counts of statutory sodomy, and two counts of incest.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose *807 would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. HOSICK, 341 S.W.3d 806, 2011 WL 2020713 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

341 S.W.3d 806 (State v. HOSICK) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related