State v. Horton

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Horton

999 N.E.2d 692, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1436

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 23, 2013·No. 2013-1901·Published

Opinion

Summit App. No. 26407, 2013-Ohio-3902. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal. On December 3, 2013, when this appeal was filed, a check in the amount of $100 was submitted by appellant to satisfy the requirement of the docket fee imposed by R.C. 2503.17 and S.Ct.Prac.R 3.04. This court has been informed by the Office of the Treasurer of the state of Ohio that the check was returned because of insufficient funds.

[1437] R.C. 2503.17 and S.Ct.Prac.R. 3.04 require that the docket fee shall be paid before a notice of appeal is filed or a ease is docketed. Therefore, it is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this cause is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summit App. No. 26407, 2013-Ohio-3902. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal. On December 3, 2013, when this appeal was filed, a check in the amount of $100 was submitted by appellant to satisfy the requirement of the docket fee imposed by R.C. 2503.17 and S.Ct.Prac.R 3.04. This court has been informed by the Office of the Treasurer of the state of Ohio that the check was returned because of insufficient funds.

[1437] R.C. 2503.17 and S.Ct.Prac.R. 3.04 require that the docket fee shall be paid before a notice of appeal is filed or a ease is docketed. Therefore, it is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this cause is dismissed.

State v. Horton, 999 N.E.2d 692, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1436 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

999 N.E.2d 692 (State v. Horton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related