State v. Horton

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Horton

823 N.E.2d 451, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1209

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 16, 2005·No. No. 2004-0523·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. John D. Ferrero Jr., Stark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kathleen 0. Tatarsky, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Stephen P. Hardwick, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. John D. Ferrero Jr., Stark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kathleen 0. Tatarsky, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Stephen P. Hardwick, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

State v. Horton, 823 N.E.2d 451, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1209 (Ohio 2005).

Pincite

823 N.E.2d 451 (State v. Horton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.