State v. . Horton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Horton

129 S.E. 925, 190 N.C. 850, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 194

DecidedSeptember 16, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 129 S.E. 925 (State v. . Horton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Horton, 129 S.E. 925, 190 N.C. 850, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 194 (N.C. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Criminal prosecution, tried upon an indictment, charging the defendants with violations of the prohibition law.

From an adverse verdict and judgment pronounced thereon, the defendants appeal, assigning errors. The evidence is plenary and conflicting on the issues of defendants' guilt; it is purely a question of fact; the jury has resolved the matter against the defendants; there is no reversible error appearing on the record; the verdict and judgments will be upheld.

No error. *Page 851

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Criminal prosecution, tried upon an indictment, charging the defendants with violations of the prohibition law.

From an adverse verdict and judgment pronounced thereon, the defendants appeal, assigning errors. The evidence is plenary and conflicting on the issues of defendants' guilt; it is purely a question of fact; the jury has resolved the matter against the defendants; there is no reversible error appearing on the record; the verdict and judgments will be upheld.

No error. *Page 851

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 S.E. 925, 190 N.C. 850, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-horton-nc-1925.