State v. Horton

146 S.W.3d 433, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1495, 2004 WL 2340028
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Horton. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 410
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 2004·No. No. ED 83551·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Keith Horton (Defendant) appeals from a conviction following a jury trial for felony driving while intoxicated, Section 577.010, RSMo 2000.1 Defendant was sentenced as a prior offender to four years of imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Horton, 146 S.W.3d 433, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1495, 2004 WL 2340028 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

146 S.W.3d 433 (State v. Horton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.