State v. Hortiz

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hortiz

46 S.W.3d 20, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 494, 2001 WL 274771

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 20, 2001·No. No. ED 77829·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alvery Hortiz (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court convicting him of first-degree murder, armed criminal action, forcible rape and forcible sodomy after a jury trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion, and a rational trier of fact could have found Appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Smith, 11 S.W.3d 733, 736 (Mo.App. E.D.1999). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alvery Hortiz (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court convicting him of first-degree murder, armed criminal action, forcible rape and forcible sodomy after a jury trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion, and a rational trier of fact could have found Appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Smith, 11 S.W.3d 733, 736 (Mo.App. E.D.1999). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Hortiz, 46 S.W.3d 20, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 494, 2001 WL 274771 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

46 S.W.3d 20 (State v. Hortiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related