State v. Horne
568 A.2d 793, 213 Conn. 807, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 357
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 19 Conn. App. Ill, is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that the trial of the defendant on four separate informations arising out of four incidents did not result in any substantial prejudice to the defendant because of the trial court’s instructions that the jury should consider each case separately?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Horne, 568 A.2d 793, 213 Conn. 807, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 357 (Colo. 1989).
568 A.2d 793 (State v. Horne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Horne
577 A.2d 694 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1990)