State v. Hopper

27 Mo. 599
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedJanuary 15, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 27 Mo. 599 (State v. Hopper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hopper, 27 Mo. 599 (Mo. 1859).

Opinion

Richardson, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It was intended to charge the defendants under the 80th section of article 8 of the act concerning crimes and punishments, (R. C. 1855, p. 630,) which declares that “ every person who shall wilfully, maliciously or contemptuously disquiet or disturb any congregation or assembly of people met for religious worship, by making a noise, &c., shall be punished,” &c. The indictment charges that the defendants unlawfully did disturb a congregation and assembly of people met for religious worship by wilfully behaving in a rude and indecent manner, and using profane discourse within the place of worship of said congregation.

The offence defined by the statute is not charged in the indictment ; for the offence does not consist simply in disquieting or disturbing a congregation, but in doing it wilfully, maliciously or contemptuously. Neither the words of the statute descriptive of the offence nor equivalent words are used. (1 Chit. C. L. 281.)

The motion to quash was properly sustained, and the judgment will be affirmed;

Judge Scott concurring. Judge Napton absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Thomas
343 S.W.2d 56 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1961)
State v. Karnes
51 Mo. App. 293 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1892)
State v. Watson
65 Mo. 115 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Mo. 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hopper-mo-1859.