State v. Hopkins
This text of 520 A.2d 334 (State v. Hopkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Defendant Earl Hopkins appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Oxford County) revoking his probation pursuant to 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1206 (1983 & Supp.1986). On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the revocation. We conclude that there was sufficient evidence presented to allow the single justice to find by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant had inexcusably failed to comply with the requirement of restitution because of his failure to make a bona fide effort to acquire the resources to pay.
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
520 A.2d 334, 1987 Me. LEXIS 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hopkins-me-1987.