Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Hop

State v. Hop

648 P.2d 1362, 58 Or. App. 527, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3225
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 11, 1982
DocketNo. 82-936-C, CA A24187
StatusPublished

This text of 648 P.2d 1362 (State v. Hop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hop, 648 P.2d 1362, 58 Or. App. 527, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3225 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction after a plea of guilty. He contends that the court erred in not allowing him to withdraw his plea of guilty on the ground that he was not adequately advised of the consequences of a guilty plea as required by ORS 135.385(2)(a). The state concedes that the advice was inadequate but contends defendant cannot raise that issue on appeal from a guilty plea. The issue raised is cognizable on appeal. State v. Dawson, 57 Or App 420, 644 P2d 665 (1982); State v. Reichert, 39 Or App 905, 593 P2d 1298 (1979).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Reichert
593 P.2d 1298 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1979)
State v. Dawson
644 P.2d 665 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
648 P.2d 1362, 58 Or. App. 527, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hop-orctapp-1982.