State v. Hoover

191 S.E.2d 377, 16 N.C. App. 189, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1674
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Hoover. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 N.C. App. 154
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided September 20, 1972·No. No. 7218SC597·Published

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Counsel for defendant, with commendable frankness, states that after an examination of the record, no prejudicial error was found.

We have reviewed the record, and we find it to be free of any prejudicial error. The defendant was afforded a trial, which was fair and free of error. The bills of indictment, pleas, judgment and sentence were in all respects regular and proper.

No error.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Britt concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hoover, 191 S.E.2d 377, 16 N.C. App. 189, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1674 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

191 S.E.2d 377 (State v. Hoover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.