State v. Hook

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hook

503 S.W.3d 294, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1140, 2016 WL 6591784

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 8, 2016

DocketWD 79043

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 503 S.W.3d 294 (State v. Hook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hook, 503 S.W.3d 294, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1140, 2016 WL 6591784 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM

Robert Hook appeals from his convictions for first-degree child molestation, first-degree statutory sodomy,, first-degree statutory rape, and incest. He contends the circuit court plainly erred in overruling his objection to expert testimony. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM

Robert Hook appeals from his convictions for first-degree child molestation, first-degree statutory sodomy,, first-degree statutory rape, and incest. He contends the circuit court plainly erred in overruling his objection to expert testimony. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

503 S.W.3d 294, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1140, 2016 WL 6591784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hook-moctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack