State v. Hooe

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hooe

407 S.W.3d 668, 2013 WL 2432140, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 667

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 4, 2013·No. No. ED 98581·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Scotty F. Hooe appeals the judgment of the trial court entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of second-degree assault of a law enforcement officer and armed criminal action. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. [669] The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Scotty F. Hooe appeals the judgment of the trial court entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of second-degree assault of a law enforcement officer and armed criminal action. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. [669] The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Hooe, 407 S.W.3d 668, 2013 WL 2432140, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 667 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

407 S.W.3d 668 (State v. Hooe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.