State v. Honore

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Honore

602 So. 2d 10, 1992 La. LEXIS 2476, 1992 WL 198158

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided August 12, 1992·No. No. 92-KH-2229·Published

Opinion

In re Honoré, Joseph a/k/a; Diggs, Maurice; — Defendant(s); applying for supervi[11]*11sory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 269-958.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for Boykin and sentencing transcripts he has filed on or about September 26, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Honoré, Joseph a/k/a; Diggs, Maurice; — Defendant(s); applying for supervi[11]*11sory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 269-958.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for Boykin and sentencing transcripts he has filed on or about September 26, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

State v. Honore, 602 So. 2d 10, 1992 La. LEXIS 2476, 1992 WL 198158 (La. 1992).

Pincite

602 So. 2d 10 (State v. Honore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.