State v. Honnert

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Honnert

399 So. 2d 61, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20028

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 26, 1981

DocketNo. 80-1169

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 399 So. 2d 61 (State v. Honnert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Honnert, 399 So. 2d 61, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20028 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state seeks review of an order of suppression rendered before the abolition of the “automatic standing” rule in Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 100 S.Ct. 2556, 65 L.Ed.2d 633 (1980) and United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83, 100 S.Ct. 2547, 65 L.Ed.2d 619 (1980). As in Coster v. State, 392 So.2d 16 (Fla.3d DCA 1980), and Priori v. State, 386 So.2d 618 (Fla.1st DCA 1980), we deem it appropriate to vacate the order under review and remand the cause for hearing and determination of whether the appellees had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the area from which the evidence in question was secured. The trial court shall thereafter enter an order on the motion to suppress consistent with its finding on that issue.

Vacated, remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The state seeks review of an order of suppression rendered before the abolition of the “automatic standing” rule in Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 100 S.Ct. 2556, 65 L.Ed.2d 633 (1980) and United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83, 100 S.Ct. 2547, 65 L.Ed.2d 619 (1980). As in Coster v. State, 392 So.2d 16 (Fla.3d DCA 1980), and Priori v. State, 386 So.2d 618 (Fla.1st DCA 1980), we deem it appropriate to vacate the order under review and remand the cause for hearing and determination of whether the appellees had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the area from which the evidence in question was secured. The trial court shall thereafter enter an order on the motion to suppress consistent with its finding on that issue.

Vacated, remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

399 So. 2d 61, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-honnert-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack