State v. Honkins

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Honkins

926 S.W.2d 550, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1336, 1996 WL 422055

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 30, 1996

DocketNo. 66822

StatusPublished

This text of 926 S.W.2d 550 (State v. Honkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Honkins, 926 S.W.2d 550, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1336, 1996 WL 422055 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Tony Honkins (“defendant”), appeals from the judgment of conviction for tampering in the first degree, RSMo § 569.080.1(2) (1986), entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a trial by jury.¹ We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find no error. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision. State v. Gaines, 807 S.W.2d 678 n. 1 (Mo.App. E.D.1991).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Tony Honkins (“defendant”), appeals from the judgment of conviction for tampering in the first degree, RSMo § 569.080.1(2) (1986), entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a trial by jury.¹ We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find no error. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision. State v. Gaines, 807 S.W.2d 678 n. 1 (Mo.App. E.D.1991).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

926 S.W.2d 550, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1336, 1996 WL 422055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-honkins-moctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack