State v. Honeycutt

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Honeycutt

257 So. 2d 684, 260 La. 985, 1972 La. LEXIS 5610

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 3, 1972

DocketNo. 51965

StatusPublished

This text of 257 So. 2d 684 (State v. Honeycutt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Honeycutt, 257 So. 2d 684, 260 La. 985, 1972 La. LEXIS 5610 (La. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendants, Billy Ray Honeycutt and Fred Honeycutt, appeal from a conviction of cattle theft, La.R.S. 14:67.1, for which they were sentenced to serve terms at hard labor in the state penitentiary.

Although the defendants reserved some thirteen bills of exceptions before and during the trial, they failed to perfect any of them as required by La.C.Cr.P. art. 845, which states that “bills of exceptions reserved during the trial shall be submitted [987]*987to the court and signed by -it * * within specified time periods.

We are therefore limited on appeal to a review of the pleadings and proceedings for discoverable error. La.C.Cr.P. art. 920; State v. Ash, 257 La. 337, 242 So.2d 535 (1971). We find none.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI