State v. Honeycutt

903 So. 2d 901, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 344, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 1004, 2005 WL 1038779
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 5, 2005
DocketNo. SC02-69
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 903 So. 2d 901 (State v. Honeycutt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Honeycutt, 903 So. 2d 901, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 344, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 1004, 2005 WL 1038779 (Fla. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision in Honeycutt v. State, 805 So.2d 987 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), which certified conflict with the decisions in Coppola v. State, 795 So.2d 258 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), and Regan v. State, 787 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). [902]*902We accept jurisdiction, see art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const., summarily quash the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Banks v. State, 887 So.2d 1191 (Fla.2004).

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Honeycutt v. State
906 So. 2d 1181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
903 So. 2d 901, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 344, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 1004, 2005 WL 1038779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-honeycutt-fla-2005.