State v. Homan
717 N.E.2d 345, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1413, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3249
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Homan. Read the opinion of the Court — 87 Ohio St. 3d 1443 →
Opinion
Erie App. No. E-97-100. Reported at 86 Ohio St.3d 1423, 712 N.E.2d 124. On October 4,1999, amicus curiae, Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association, filed a motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration and a motion for reconsideration. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(2) prescribes that an amicus curiae may not file a motion for reconsideration without prior leave of this court,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion for reconsideration be, and hereby is, stricken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Homan, 717 N.E.2d 345, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1413, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3249 (Ohio 1999).
717 N.E.2d 345 (State v. Homan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.