State v. Holt

498 A.2d 591, 1985 Me. LEXIS 848
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedOctober 3, 1985
StatusPublished

This text of 498 A.2d 591 (State v. Holt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Holt, 498 A.2d 591, 1985 Me. LEXIS 848 (Me. 1985).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Hancock County, Kevin D. Holt claims error in the denial of his motion to suppress evidence of his habitual offender status obtained as a result of an investigatory stop of his vehicle. Because the motion justice was not clearly erroneous in finding that the police officer acted on the basis of specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warranted the intrusion, we deny the appeal. Cf. State v. Chapman, 495 A.2d 314 (Me.1985) (stop without articulable suspicion violates fourth amendment).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Chapman
495 A.2d 314 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
498 A.2d 591, 1985 Me. LEXIS 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-holt-me-1985.