State v. Holt

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Holt

218 So. 3d 498, 2017 WL 1967412, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6825

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 12, 2017·No. Case No. 5D16-651·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based upon Appellee’s proper concession of error, we reverse the order suppressing evidence and remand for further proceedings. See State v. Green, 943 So.2d 1004, 1005 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (illuminating interior of vehicle using flashlight does not implicate Fourth Amendment; officer had probable cause to believe vehicle contained cocaine after illuminating inside of [499]*499vehicle and seeing razor blade with white residue on center console).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

TORPY and LAMBERT, JJ„ and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based upon Appellee’s proper concession of error, we reverse the order suppressing evidence and remand for further proceedings. See State v. Green, 943 So.2d 1004, 1005 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (illuminating interior of vehicle using flashlight does not implicate Fourth Amendment; officer had probable cause to believe vehicle contained cocaine after illuminating inside of [499]*499vehicle and seeing razor blade with white residue on center console).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

TORPY and LAMBERT, JJ„ and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.

State v. Holt, 218 So. 3d 498, 2017 WL 1967412, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6825 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

218 So. 3d 498 (State v. Holt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related