State v. Holmes

856 N.E.2d 980, 111 Ohio St. 3d 1210
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 29, 2006·No. No. 2005-0937·Published

Opinions

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Holmes, 856 N.E.2d 980, 111 Ohio St. 3d 1210 (Ohio 2006).

856 N.E.2d 980 (State v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDonald v. United States
335 U.S. 451 (Supreme Court, 1948)
United States v. Jeffers
342 U.S. 48 (Supreme Court, 1951)
Chimel v. California
395 U.S. 752 (Supreme Court, 1969)
Vale v. Louisiana
399 U.S. 30 (Supreme Court, 1970)
Coolidge v. New Hampshire
403 U.S. 443 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
412 U.S. 218 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Payton v. New York
445 U.S. 573 (Supreme Court, 1980)
Illinois v. Rodriguez
497 U.S. 177 (Supreme Court, 1990)
Minnesota v. Dickerson
508 U.S. 366 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Georgia v. Randolph
547 U.S. 103 (Supreme Court, 2006)
Arnold v. City of Cleveland
616 N.E.2d 163 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1993)
State v. Robinette
685 N.E.2d 762 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
State v. Roberts
850 N.E.2d 1168 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)