State v. Holmes

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Holmes

481 S.W.3d 82, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 40, 2016 WL 316137

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 26, 2016·No. No. ED 102042·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donrico Holmes appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of two counts of first-degree robbery, two counts of sexual abuse, two counts of attempted first-degree robbery, one count of attempted sexual abuse, one count of first-degree assault, and eight counts of armed criminal action. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donrico Holmes appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of two counts of first-degree robbery, two counts of sexual abuse, two counts of attempted first-degree robbery, one count of attempted sexual abuse, one count of first-degree assault, and eight counts of armed criminal action. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Holmes, 481 S.W.3d 82, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 40, 2016 WL 316137 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

481 S.W.3d 82 (State v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.