State v. Holmes

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Holmes

877 S.W.2d 687, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 975, 1994 WL 256678

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Holmes. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 605 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 14, 1994·No. Nos. 61448, 64805·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is a consolidated appeal of Defendant’s appeals from his conviction for first degree robbery and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion addressing Defendant’s direct appeal would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Nor would an opinion addressing the appeal from the denial of his 29.15 motion serve a prece-dential purpose. We have provided the parties a memorandum for their use only detailing our reasons for affirmance.

Judgments affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.-25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is a consolidated appeal of Defendant’s appeals from his conviction for first degree robbery and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion addressing Defendant’s direct appeal would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Nor would an opinion addressing the appeal from the denial of his 29.15 motion serve a prece-dential purpose. We have provided the parties a memorandum for their use only detailing our reasons for affirmance.

Judgments affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.-25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Holmes, 877 S.W.2d 687, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 975, 1994 WL 256678 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

877 S.W.2d 687 (State v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.