State v. Holly

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Holly

260 N.W.2d 293

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 2, 1977·No. No. 46536·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of burglary, Minn.St. 609.58, subd. 2(l)(b), and attempted aggravated rape, Minn.St.1974, § 609.291(1) and (2), and Minn.St. 609.17, and was sentenced to concurrent 20 and 15 years in prison. On this appeal from judgment of conviction defendant contends that the evidence adduced concerning the extent of his intoxication and its effect on him was such as to compel a finding that he was too intoxicated to form the requisite criminal intent. There is no merit to this contention. The record strongly supports defendant’s conviction.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of burglary, Minn.St. 609.58, subd. 2(l)(b), and attempted aggravated rape, Minn.St.1974, § 609.291(1) and (2), and Minn.St. 609.17, and was sentenced to concurrent 20 and 15 years in prison. On this appeal from judgment of conviction defendant contends that the evidence adduced concerning the extent of his intoxication and its effect on him was such as to compel a finding that he was too intoxicated to form the requisite criminal intent. There is no merit to this contention. The record strongly supports defendant’s conviction.

Affirmed.

State v. Holly, 260 N.W.2d 293 (Mich. 1977).

Pincite

260 N.W.2d 293 (State v. Holly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.